Revolting against the Bangist consensus, the vanguard of skeptical astrophysics has started kicking Bucky's balls around:
Finding: Buckminsterfullerenes are absorbing starlight
Of course, Nature won’t allow
any mention of the possibility that redshift is somehow associated with the
absorption by interstellar and intergalactic matter.
The state of cosmology is still as
Al-Gorian as that of climatology, maybe more so. But the next generation of
astrophysicists will laugh (bitterly) at Martin Rees, Leif Svalgaard, and other
“watchdogs” of the BBT.
As long as these blackguards of
science are alive, though, no observational evidence, no laws of physics, no
reality shall touch the lambda-cold dark matter of their committee-allocated
brains.
Bobl July 15, 2015 at 8:36 pm .
There is a tendency to exclude the obvious explanation that the permeability of free space is not a constant throughout all space-time.
There is a tendency to exclude the obvious explanation that the permeability of free space is not a constant throughout all space-time.
Who are “we”… “us”…? Speak for
yourself, and name yourself.
The Big Bang creationist fantasy
contradicts every possible observation, and there are dozens of theories that
explain redshift better than your Holy Textbook.
I stand with Hoyle, Arp, Ratcliff,
Burbidge, Narlikar and many others persecuted by academic bureaucrats in the
name of their feeding troughs. Hubble himself rejected the primitive
redshift-as-velocity fairy tale. falsified by thousands of observations.
BBT is dead.observation, and there
are dozens of theories that explain redshift better than your Holy Textbook.
I stand with Hoyle, Arp, Ratcliff, Burbidge, Narlikar and
many others persecuted by academic bureaucrats in the name of their feeding
troughs. Hubble himself rejected the primitive redshift-as-velocity fairy tale.
falsified by thousands of observations. BBT is dead.
