Sunday, June 12, 2016


The  censors  at  WUWT  refuse  to run  criticism of  Eric Worrall's latest anti-historical effusion, which compares past and present Paris floods and points to a famous high water mark to argue that climate change is somehow reducing flood risks.  Worrall asks:

"What is the history of flooding in Paris? Information on floods is a little difficult to find, perhaps because I don’t speak French, but the following from a critical OECD report on Parisian flood risk preparedness is revealing; 
While the possibility of a major flood of the Seine River may initially seem remote, it comes back regularly and arouses public attention as was the case during the spring of 2013 when floods took place upstream of the Seine River basin. Even though the flooding did not cause any major damage, it reopened the question of risk management and the region’s vulnerability to flooding. The prospect of a historic event is a key concern for French risk management stakeholders. The 1910 flood was particularly destructive in the context of an era marked by industrial and technological progress. Such events illustrate the difficulties societies have in compromising between economic development and the management of increased vulnerability of society and multiple economic sectors.
1924 and 1955 also saw major flood events in the Paris region and in the entire Seine basin. Nevertheless, the lack of a significant flood for more than 60 years tends to lessen the memory of risk."
Memory indeed fails Worrall, as he fails to provide the  2014 OECD report's most relevant conclusion: 
" the shock of the 1910 flood and smaller floods in 1924 and 1955 had prompted the building of dams upstream and civil engineering works in the city itself to prevent floods."
The bridge-guarding  Zouave didn't end up chin deep in Le Big Muddy  this time because  les anciens of the Ecole des Ponts et Chaussees began diverting the upper Seine into flood control watercourses a century ago,  mitigating how high the river can rise today.