CLIMATE SASQUATCH INTERVIEWED BY DELINGPOLE

 GREAT NORTH WOODS LEGEND  DECLINES  PODCAST
BUT  BREITBART 'INTERPRETER  OF  INTERPRETATIONS' DISCOVERS 

 UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO MATHEMATICIAN WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE EXISTENCE OF A 'GLOBAL MEAN TEMPERATURE'
AND CONSIDERS CLIMATE MODELING ' A FRANKENSTEIN'S MONSTER'

Alas  for xenobiology, the  Delingpole  Podcast  Specimen  proves on  skeptical  examination  to be  just  another GWPF  approved   Breitbart  columnist: 

A thought provoking piece today in Breitbart by Dr Christopher Essex. 
25 March  2015

Members of the Scientific Council of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) recently criticized the Royal Society’s positions on climate.

Their clear, authoritative scientific objections to the Royal Society’s positions reveal the weak scientific foundation on which the great climate fervor has been based. The public must either become conversant enough to grasp this or step back and get out of the way of those who have. Scientists don’t need to be paid to oppose the ideas of climate orthodoxy, because those ideas are just so damn bad.

To the Bitter End

Accusing scientists of venal motives when they raise questions about climate has come to be what passes for scientific debate. Unlike the GWPF critique, this is not science at all

same old Sasquatch , two years later