THE JOURNAL OF BOREDOM STUDIES
Make the Holocene Great Again!
Or, Why Is Climate Change Boring?
M.E. Gardiner, University of Western Ontario
Abstract
Three main areas will be addressed.
The first task is to discuss how “boredom” itself can be characterized as a relatively coherent and valid analytical concept, and how it might be linked to the climate crisis specifically, through sociology of emotion and psychoanalytical approaches.
Second, climate change’s ontological status as what Timothy Morton calls “hyperobjects” will be examined – entities so complex, and extended across almost limitless time and space, they cannot be comprehended by our usual analogies, perceptions, and metrics. Boredom looms here as affective and libidinal disengagement protecting the psyche from the hyperobject’s unsettling effects of cognitive overreach and emotional dissonance.
The third theme is “climate apocalypticism”: endless reiterations of our dystopian future, it is argued, evince a monotonous similarity, resulting in emotional exhaustion, melancholia, and morose resignation – and ultimately boredom.
The article’s conclusion will focus on some of the ways in which “climate boredom” might prompt a more critical and engaged collective responses to the climate emergency.
References
Anderson, B. (2023). Boredom and the Politics of Climate Change. Scottish Geographical Journal, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2023.2197869
Bataille, G. (2004). Unfinished System of Non-knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation. University of Michigan Press.
Bellamy, B. R. (2022). Ecology with Totality: The Case of Morton’s Hyperobjects and Klein’s This Changes Everything’.
In K. Floyd et al. (Eds.), Totality inside Out: Rethinking Crisis and Conflict Under Capital (pp. 211–235). Fordham University Press
