THAT'S A 14 ESTIMATE CONSENSUS, AND IT'S TOO EARLY TO INVOKE MURPHY'S SECOND LAW *, BUT ITS PUBLICISTS HAVE NOT BEEN TRANSPARENT AS TO WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MODEL OUTCOMES ARE INTER-COMPARED USING THE WHOLE SET OF SENSITIVITY ESTIMATE PAPERS , N ~ 80, AS BAYESIAN PRIORS, INSTEAD OF JUST THE 13
STAY TUNED FOR LOUD SILENCE, AS N ≥ 500 NEWS OUTLETS TAKE THEIR LEAD FROM CLIMATE DESK & COVERING CLIMATE NOW.
*
If everything must go wrong, don't bet on it.
PARDON THE ANCIENT FAXED END , AND THE DETAIL GAP BETWEEN TODAY AND GREGORY ET AL'S ARTICLE
How accurately can the climate sensitivity to be estimated from historical climate change?