WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG WITH BASING CLIMATE POLICY ON LACAN, ZIZEK & FOUCAULT ?

Cracking the code: how discursive structures shape climate engineering research governance

Miranda Boettcher a,b

aInstitute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e.V. (IASS), Potsdam, Germany; bFreie

Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

ABSTRACT

There is increasing interest in developing anticipatory governance of climate engineering (CE) research.

Discourse is the source code with which contested futures are written, shaping how future governance options can be imagined, designed and institutionalized. ‘Cracking the code’ underpinning the CE research governance debate can, therefore, help anticipate and critically reflect upon the ongoing constitution of governance.

I present a sociology-of-knowledge-baseddiscourse analysis (SKAD) of a series of interviews with governance experts from the US, the UK and Germany about a proposed Code of Conduct for climate engineering research. I illustrate how – by shaping what is defined as the object(s) of governance, why governance is considered necessary, and who is assigned the authority to govern – the underlying discursive

REFERENCES

Battling Promethean dreams and Trojan horses: revealing the critical discourses of geoengineering.

Energy Research & Social Science, 2, 135–144. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.001

Cairns, R. 2016. 

Climates of suspicion: ‘chemtrail’ conspiracy narratives and the international politics of geoengineering.
Geographical Journal, 182 (1), 70–84. doi:10.1111/geoj.12116

Diaz-Bone, R., 2006. 

Zur methodologisierung der Foucaultschen Diskursanalyse.

Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 31 (2 (116)), 243–274.

Foucault, M., 1969 (2002). The archaeology of knowledge.
London & New York: Routledge.

Keller, R., Hornridge, A.-K., and Schünemann, W.J., 2018. 

The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse: investigating the politics of knowledge and meaningmaking.

London & New York: Routledge.

Kerchner, B. and Schneider, S., eds., 2006.

Foucault: diskursanalyse der politik
Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Nerlich, B. and Jaspal, R. 2012. 

Metaphors we die by?  Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe.  

Metaphor and Symbol, 27 (2), 131–147. doi:10.1080/10926488.2012.665795

Sikka, T. 2012. 

A critical discourse analysis of geoengineering advocacy.  

Critical Discourse Studies, 9 (2), 163–175. doi:10.1080/17405904.2012.656377

Surprise, K., 2019.
Stratospheric imperialism: liberalism, (eco)modernization, and ideologies of solar geoengineering research. 

Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2514848619844771.

Torfing, J., 1999. 

New theories of discourse: Laclan, Mouffe and Zizek.  
Oxford: Blackwell.