Wednesday, May 30, 2018

                       UNUSUALLY UNRELIABLE SOURCES

CFACT'S  FACTOID CLEARING HOUSE, CLIMATE DEPOT  THINKS TURNING  TUNDRA  INTO MOLTEN MUSKEG  IS A  GOOD THING,  AS IT MEANS  HIGHER  CROP YIELDS  IN  BAFFIN  ISLAND & LAPLAND




Climate SHOCK: Global warming could produce MORE farming land, scientists admit

CLIMATE change could increase the overall amount of boreal land ready for farming by up to 44 percent, a study has shockingly claimed. 


TODAY'S OTHER STORIES FROM UNUSUALLY RELIABLE CLIMATE DEPOT SOURCE  SEBASTIAN KETTLEY:




Life on Mars: ‘Sphinx statue’ found in NASA photo evidence of ancient alien UFOs on Mars?

Mars life alien statue sphinx NASA photo UFO evidence ancient aliens

3D printed EYES: Scientists play God and make first step towards ARTIFICIAL HUMANS

Science news 3D printed organs cornea medical breakthrough

Is this mystery object a crashed UFO? Officials uncover truth behind bizarre crash landing

UFO crash landing Poland alien craft jet fighter

Time travel news: Flux Capacitor breaks time-reversal symmetry - but there’s a twist


Time Travel news flux capacitor time machine Back to the Future

MCM Comic Con 2018 in pictures: Best cosplays from UK’s biggest comic book convention

MCM Comic Con 2018 pictures cosplays cosplayers London excel centre
MCM Comic Con 2018 has wrapped up at London’s Excel Centre after pulling in thousands of enthusiastic comic book and gaming fans from all over the world. Here are exclusive photos of the best cosplays and the talented people behind them from this year’s MCM Comic Con London.

Monday, May 21, 2018

PRUITT MINIONS FLEE FRANKNESS OF BRIDENSTINE


Dozens of Administrator Priutt's EPA minions cast their torches & pitchforks aside last week, and fled into the Potomac fever swamps, horrified by NASA Administrator Bridenstine's shocking lack of contempt for climate science

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

                 THE SCIENCE EDITOR DONNED A CHICKEN SUIT
                                       TO  HIDE  HIS  SHAME

The Sea Is Rising, but Not Because of Climate Change

There is nothing we can do about it, except to build dikes and sea walls a little bit higher.

By Fred Singer
WSJ Science Editor with
 a man in a Falstaff suit 

Of all known and imagined consequences of climate change, many people fear sea-level rise most. But efforts to determine what causes seas to rise are marred by poor data and disagreements about methodology... 
 I therefore conclude—contrary to the general wisdom—that the temperature of sea water has no direct effect on sea-level rise. [ Oh yeah?] That means neither does the atmospheric content of carbon dioxide.
This conclusion is worth highlighting: It shows that sea-level rise does not depend on the use of fossil fuels. The evidence should allay fear that the release of additional CO2 will increase sea- level rise...There is nothing we can do about rising sea levels in the meantime. We’d better build dikes and sea walls a little bit higher.

Mr. Singer is Married to a lobbyist  A professional witness for a firm of patent trolls Working both sides of K-Street   Former chief scientist of the Department of Transportation  93 years old  The Reverend Moon's science adviser   The Cosmos Club bore   Author of 131 equally  incoherent American Thinker screeds  a professor emeritus of environmental science at the University of Virginia. He founded the Science and Environmental Policy Project and the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change.

"Don’t use glaciers as thermometers... In my view…when the next ice age starts,  more of the  sea water  will  freeze and become ice  and sea level  will fall back  down  to what it was  during the last ice age... 
There is in fact no real correlation. There were warm periods and there’ve been  cold periods; these correlate more with the way the solar system moves through the galaxy. 
Which has nothing to do with carbon dioxide is a completely different issue but has a lot to do with what exists in galactic arms, namely increased intensity of cosmic rays. Apparently that factor is an important factor in changing the climate."
                          -- Fred Singer radio broadcast  2013




Dr. Fred Singer on ‘Global Warming Surprises’     -- WATTS UP WITH THAT 2017


Temp data in dispute can reverse conclusions about human influence on climate.
Guest essay by Dr. Fred Singer
Exploring some of the intricacies of GW [Global Warming] science can lead to surprising results that have major consequences. In a recent invited talk at the Heartland Institute’s ICCC-12 [Twelfth International Conference on Climate Change], I investigated three important topics:
1. Inconsistencies in the surface temperature record.
2. Their explanation as artifacts arising from the misuse of data.
3. Thereby explaining the failure of IPCC to find credible evidence for anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
In the iconic picture of the global surface temperature of the 20th century one can discern two warming intervals — in the initial decades (1910-42) and in the final decades, 1977 to 2000.
Although these two trends look similar, they are really  quite different:  the initial warming is genuine, but the later warming is not. What a surprise!  I wouldn’t exactly call it ‘fake,’  but it just does not exist;


Sunday, May 6, 2018

CABIN FEVER STRIKES CALGARY FRIENDS OF SCIENCE GURU

NOTED  CANADIAN  GOOSE LIVER HARUSPEX, 
ART HISTORIAN & HUDSON'S BAY  BLANKET COLLECTOR
EXPLAINS WHY SCIENCE SHOULD
PREFER FICTION TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 

The Biggest Deception in the Human Caused Global Warming Deception


Guest Opinion: Dr. Tim Ball
It is likely that every year annual variance in the amount of water vapour in the atmosphere exceeds the warming effects of human CO2. I can’t prove it, but nobody can disprove it with any reasonable measure of evidence because there is insufficient data or understanding of natural processes. However, it is likely true, and alone destroys the human-caused global warming (AGW) narrative. This is one reason why AGW is the biggest, most pervasive, and longest lasting ‘fake news’ story to date. It is also a ‘deep state’ story created and perpetuated by and through the bureaucracies.
Part of the reason the deception persists is because of the failure of skeptics to explain the scientific problems with the AGW claim in a way people can understand. As I have written, most people, that is the 85% who lack science skills, find the science arguments of most skeptics too arcane.
However, there are problems on both sides of the debate that preclude, or at least seriously limit, the possibility of clear understanding and explanation. It is the lack of data. There is so much speculation without any facts that it is time to consider the lessons of problem solving identified by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle through his detective Sherlock Holmes.
It is important to use a fictional source for this reminder because, in the real world, facts and data are no longer a prerequisite. There is virtually no real weather or climate data,... 
There is a multitude of variables overlooked or ignored. Almost all are unmeasured or even minimally measured... 

I will focus on water vapour because it is the least measured, least understood, and yet critical to the entire basis of the warming due to human interference in the greenhouse gas theory. The IPCC was able to essentially ignore it a cause of warming by the definition of climate change that only includes human causes. Ironically, as I will explain, they use and manipulate it to bolster their deception.
The obsessive political objective was to isolate and demonize CO2 from human sources as the cause of global warming. This was primarily achieved by directing the controlled group of unaccountable people, mostly bureaucrats, to only consider human-causes of climate change. That eliminates the Sun because, as King Canute showed, there are things that no leader (person) can control.
So, not only have Sherlock and Watson lost their tent, but they are now exposed to precipitation. Unfortunately, the IPCC and their models will not know what form it will take. Sherlock would know why. It is because they have no data and are theorizing and speculating.

Tuesday, May 1, 2018

                          THE  HEDGEHOG  SHARKNADO !

MANHATTAN PONDERS  AFRICAN CLIMATE REFUGEE  BAN  AS
SHARK ACTIVISTS AND HEDGEHOG ECOLOGISTS SUE FOR
 MICROAGRESSION  &  CULTURAL  APPROPRIATION