 |
Journal of the Modem Language Association Vol XXI Winter 2014-15, p 79-81
|
Lexical forcing of optical & metaphoric depth in the Anthropocene climate op-ed optimum
In today's climate of opinion, Marcuse's One Dimensional Editorial Language Model (MODELM) has grown in impertinence by reifying Hansen's thesis that: “Truth is responsible for warming.”
In dielectical contrast, the George Mason school of semiotics( CF Michaels & Singer, 2005) maintains it is less truth that is responsible for carbon dioxide, than the futile articulation of the Aristotelian warming paradigm as a signification of water vapor by the cis-socratics, e.g. Aristophanes discussion of the iris effect and sunlight focusing in Clouds and Frogs , and more recently, the esoteric climate hermeneutics of Lindzen and Fish.
Decades before the term “global warming” became chic, semioticians elucidated the prospect of a mini-Ice Age in consequence of MacLuhans postulation of cool media. Only when a post-ecologistant lacanian reading revealed the lack of transgendered author titles in the neoliberal style manual of The American Meteorological Society did many realize that in the end, all temperature is text.
The post-Althuserian work of Baliunas brings renewed emphasis to the concept of capitalist climate culture. In a sense, this mirrors Idoru, in which Gibson deconstructs climate constructivism; and the visual reification of the ELM computer modeling paradigm in the solarized scenes of The Matrix Reloaded , which allude to the alienation of causality and metaphysics in the modeling gestalt.
This is not lost on Vienna Circle structuralists like Siegfied Fred Singer, and naive Frankfurt School realists such as Keneth Haaaplala, who point out that denying the Ibsonian angst of An Inconvenient Truth affirms capitalist subdialectic stratosphere theory as a medium of semiosis.
Even if the alarmists’ claim that the earth’s temperature is rising one microdegree an hour were conceded, pre-Lacanian models would still have failed to predict the significant cooling or lexical forcing of optical depth and metaphoric breadth that the oceans have undergone. This is antithetic to how global warming would be construed in popular culture were readers to choose Derridaist reading over the formalized carbonic nihilism of Viscount Monckton and Lord Bertrand Russell.
Why require the nations of this planet to spend the hundreds of billions of dollars necessary to reduce carbon dioxide and other emissions when it invites Althuserian anomie, and epistemic doubt as to whether temperature change caused by human activity is even more dangerous than transgressive texts entering the scientific canon? Consider the recent Papal encyclical , Laudatio Si.
“Consciousness is fundamentally dead,” says Foucault; however, with the advent of Artificiality computer models of climate may transcend normative theology by singularizing into generators of their own hermeneutic hierarchy. According to Albi , it is not so much consciousness that is fundamentally dead, but rather the paradigm, and embodying parametric atmospheric models in sentient algorithms. This, Legates and McIntyre would say, embodies the absurdity of consciousness as a post-modeling condition. Therefore, Bataille uses the term ‘capitalist discourse’ to denote the difference between global warmism, sexual identity and cis-climatized culture in the post Cold War era.
The main theme of the works of Hansen is transgressive because the role of the climate software writer as observer. Hence the feminist discourse of Interior Secretary Bruce Babbit, who claimed that oil and coal companies in the U.S. have joined in a conspiracy to hire pseudo scientists to deny the facts in denial of Habermas teaching that there are in fact none to falsify, thus Potemkinizing the transformational grammar of McLuhan's global village even while leading to ozone depletion in the cybersphere.
The primary theme of Buxton’s model of the climate of capitalist subdialectic theory is the bridge between society and sexuality. Thus, the premise of constructivism states that society, surprisingly, has objective value. If the Derridaist reading of Gore's thesis holds, we have to choose between the subconceptualist textual theory of logocentric radiative variability espoused by Spencer, and a post-encyclical theory in which anthropogenic warming is no longer a signifier of the miraculous.
If Heidigger never know that ancient lexa reduce to semantic monads, it is because of Soon et al's paper in the Oregon Journal of Intertextual Climate Research, argued that there really had been a Medieval warm period. How has this anachronality of juxtaposition as dasein obviated temporal and lexical space in culturally framed post-Aristotelian models in contemporary America?
Explaining how dasein has become a predominant concept in the distinction between figure and ground in framing models in the popular imagination, Fish might say that Sontag uses the term ‘capitalist subdialectic theory’ to denote a self-falsifying MODELM paradox like "global warmism" in ways paralleling the multi-dimensional nature of the IPCC paradigm, but reflecting Marcuse’s one dimensional man, Milloy and Limbaugh therefore imply that we have to choose between climatic relativism and modernist pretextual theory ,or else face the consequences of Moore's law as the climate of opinion faces hermeneutic decay as culture and cyberclimate merge.
Are post-structuralist alternatives to a Web 3.0 view of the climate debate too horrible to contemplate. Some fear the moral hazard of recent Nobel Peace Prizes inspiring a Murdoch run for Stockholm in the footstems of Obama El-Baradei and Gore.
To deconstruct that contingency, this transgressive textual canon by has been articulated by running random excerpts from Lingua Franca and Wall Street Journal editorials on climate change through the PoMo jargon generator.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
If you want one, just send a contribution to defray page charges to mnestheus@paypal
